With the vision of Shutter Island, last night, ending the small number of movie releases that I ground in the last seven days: Wolfman Benicio del Toro and Anthony Hopkins, Invictus with the excellent trio Eastwood-Freeman-Damon and, indeed, Shutter Island the now tried and tested pair Scorsese-Di Caprio.
a period full of great film at least on paper, since the actors and directors in the field, which led me to having to select some and exclude others certainly interesting as Burton's Alice In Wonderland, while holding the sleeves (three films in seven days I think, however, a tolerance rather than good).
Since the film quality was high, and expectations were largely met, jot down a quick review for each of the three that I hope will be useful to anyone who is willing to see good cinema.
Respecting a purely chronological overview, first on the list is The Wolfman. I state now that the trio, was probably the most disappointing but I am confident that this period is distorted. The Wolfman in my opinion it's still a decent film in which perhaps more than dwelling solely on the plot and the plot (in the final objective a bit poor) asks the viewer to focus on other details: the locations and photography, well made, engaging, with gloomy scenarios that include the film fits perfectly with the story, gray, like the soul of the protagonist, as black as the curse that hits it, the acting, to dwell on the ability of Del Toro and Hopkins seems superfluous; the trick where the realism of the werewolf are worth the four hours of makeup every day that Benicio was put up to try a physicality in the face of the special effects they might not have been able to give. In short, all details sought in wanting to stay as close to the famous film of 1941, which deserves to be seen, if I were to vote, a 7 would be honest. Following is the turn of Invictus, the film on which I had more expectations ever since the cast and impressive curiosity in a piece of modern history of which I know little or nothing.
and expectations, fortunately, were not disappointed. For those who had no idea of \u200b\u200bthe plot, it is essentially the story of the first month presidency of Mandela in South Africa after the fall of apartheid, the party pressed on the urgency of a government still young and inexperienced, Mandela appears to give more importance to leveling the inevitable inter-racial hatred and to do so decides to give a central role in the Rugby, Springboks, historically a symbol of white power. Mandela and the team succeed in their intent to unite the nation without regard to color, thanks to contacts with the people aimed at raising awareness of the rugby and unexpectedly won a world championship thanks to a firm on the "invincible" All Blacks. Eastwood as a director m'รจ always liked despite the cynical mood that permeates his films always, see for once a happy ending is no doubt delight (after all is history) and Eastwood moves well in this situation, emotions and emotion several times in the film. Morgan Freeman is incredible, perfect in a part that was trying for years and that even the same Mandela was elected as the perfect candidate to interpret. Bravo also give depth to the actor Matt Damon in a Supporting Role and avoid being the ability to overpower Freeman. Overall, therefore
masterful director and actors phenomenal, but above all a great message against racism, against his own foolishness and stupidity that it generates. 9 votes, no doubt deserved.
last of this series of reviews is Shutter Island. I went to see him with mixed feelings: on the one hand I was very curious to review the work the company rewarded Scorsese-Di Caprio and the trailer had me well prepared, on the other hand I had collected some evidence on film is not exactly exciting, opinions are positive but lukewarm. After watching, I would say that instead of Shutter Island is a great film.
bizarre, twisted, sometimes anxious, not sure though as reference points as they advance the minute information is ever increasing. The story goes on but nothing is ever certain that everyone makes their own assumptions, only to eventually discover the truth, touching just as it is disturbing. Scorsese directs well although this time it is masterful as in The Departed, DiCaprio gives an interpretation rather remarkable, reflecting the fact that somewhere in this film is part can easily define a great actor (the turning point for me was Blood Diamond).
Overall, a recommended film for anyone. Trae may mislead the trailer, which may suggest a thriller by "jumping on the chair" as it is more correct to call it psychologically. However, to see, vote 8.
0 comments:
Post a Comment